Socrates professes ignorance about virtue and insists that one cannot answer questions about its properties (such as whether it is teachable) without first knowing what virtue itself is.

By Plato, from Meno

Key Arguments

  • He claims that neither he nor any Athenian knows what virtue is, let alone whether it is teachable: without knowing the 'what' (quid) one cannot know the 'what‑like' (quale).
  • He uses an analogy: if he knew nothing about who Meno is, he could not say whether Meno is fair, rich, or noble; likewise, without knowing what virtue is, he cannot say whether it is taught, practiced, or natural.
  • He presents his stance as part of a broader intellectual poverty in Athens, contrasting it with Thessaly, where Gorgias has given people the habit of giving bold answers to such questions.

Source Quotes

I am certain that if you were to ask any Athenian whether virtue was natural or acquired, he would laugh in your face, and say: 'Stranger, you have far too good an opinion of me, if you think that I can answer your question. For I literally do not know what virtue is, and much less whether it is acquired by teaching or not.' And I myself, Meno, living as I do in this region of poverty, am as poor as the rest of the world; and I confess with shame that I know literally nothing about virtue; and when I do not know the 'quid' of anything how can I know the 'quale'?
For I literally do not know what virtue is, and much less whether it is acquired by teaching or not.' And I myself, Meno, living as I do in this region of poverty, am as poor as the rest of the world; and I confess with shame that I know literally nothing about virtue; and when I do not know the 'quid' of anything how can I know the 'quale'? How, if I knew nothing at all of Meno, could I tell if he was fair, or the opposite of fair; rich and noble, or the reverse of rich and noble?
And I myself, Meno, living as I do in this region of poverty, am as poor as the rest of the world; and I confess with shame that I know literally nothing about virtue; and when I do not know the 'quid' of anything how can I know the 'quale'? How, if I knew nothing at all of Meno, could I tell if he was fair, or the opposite of fair; rich and noble, or the reverse of rich and noble? Do you think that I could?

Key Concepts

  • For I literally do not know what virtue is, and much less whether it is acquired by teaching or not.
  • and when I do not know the 'quid' of anything how can I know the 'quale'?
  • How, if I knew nothing at all of Meno, could I tell if he was fair, or the opposite of fair; rich and noble, or the reverse of rich and noble?

Context

Opening of the dialogue proper, immediately after Meno asks whether virtue is acquired by teaching, practice, or nature; Socrates uses his characteristic profession of ignorance to redirect the discussion toward definition.